This can be achieved directly from a sample of activated sludge or digester sludge. The DNA sequence of this marker gene is then checked against a reference database and, if the gene is present, the bacteria can be identified. However, the big problem is that existing databases are underpopulated and only contain a limited number of sequences, especially the relevant ones that come from sludge, so the majority of microbes from wastewater systems remain unidentified.
Our team has developed a new sequencing method that has addressed these shortcomings. We have now made a new ecosystem-specific database that contains sequences from nearly all microbes present in Danish wastewater treatment plants and digesters, called MiDAS Microbial Database for Activated Sludge.
Since most of the microorganisms are new and undescribed, we have also developed a new MiDAS taxonomy — an identification system that allows all species to be given a unique ID, so they can be recognised in future studies in any part of the world.
We know that many of the microbes in Danish plants are also abundant across the world, so use of the new identification systems the reference database and taxonomy is useful for all working in the field. Furthermore, we are currently working on a global survey that will enable us to make a near-complete reference database for microbes found in wastewater treatment plants and digesters worldwide.
We expect this to be available in early Such a comprehensive database is really needed. So far, it has been impossible to identify the microbes to species level, and it is also often difficult to achieve identification at a genus level because of limitations of existing public databases. Eventually, we will be able to link the function and importance for operation to all relevant microbes. We have already started to collect all available information, which can be viewed on the project website: MiDAS Field Guide www.
With this tool, we aim for a collective effort and hope other researchers in the field will help to complement the guide by providing new information when it becomes available. One of the key questions in microbial ecology is, how many microbial species exist in a given ecosystem. The survey of Danish plants has shown that in a typical treatment plant 2— species are present.
However, most are in very low abundance, and presumably are not important to the treatment processes, with only a few hundred being abundant and important. There exists a significant similarity in microbial community structure among most plants, especially where they have the same overall process design e.
Our best estimate for the total number of species across the world is 25—30,, and we look forward to finishing the global survey and answering that question. Most of the species found are novel and unknown, and many also belong to undescribed genera.
It is indeed a challenge to reveal the functions of those microbes, but we have a range of approaches to achieve that. When we know their fingerprint gene, we can also design markers to visualise them by fluorescence microscopy, a technique called fluorescence in situ hybridisation FISH. Microbes in the wastewater treatment plants can have many morphologies but are often small rods growing in small colonies. Some form long filaments, sometimes millimetres long see Figure 2a , and they can cause serious operational problems, such as poor settling in the clarifier or foaming.
We can combine FISH with other stainings or spectroscopic techniques, such as Raman microspectroscopy, and in this way obtain information about physiological traits — for example, whether they are polyphosphate-accumulating organisms Figures 2b and 3 , carry out nitrification or consume specific nutrients. Novel developments in sequencing technologies are now also paving the way for gaining access to the entire genomes of most key organisms in activated sludge systems and digesters.
We will soon be ready with more than high-quality genomes from the Danish wastewater treatment plants, serving as a blueprint of important information about their physiological potential and function in wastewater treatment systems.
Oxygen in secondary treatment is provided manually by pumping oxygen into the sewage continuously which occurs in an aeration tank [5]. In tertiary treatment, the removal of excess organic matter is enhanced by settling the sewage in a lagoon. This process is also aerobic, but it depends on the diffusion of oxygen because most organic matter has been degraded by secondary treatment [5].
Acidity plays a crucial role in the breakdown of organic matter because pH affects the solubility of compounds which indirectly affect the accessibility by bacteria [8]. Also, bacteria responsible for organic matter degradation are sensitive to the pH of the environment. Extremely high or low pH levels are able to kill bacteria, deposition of organic matter occurs due to lack of degradation [6]. Hence, the pH of sewage treatment is controlled to be around 7.
The effect of temperature is influential for secondary treatment, but it is not important in primary treatment. Bacterial growth is sensitive to temperature because high temperature can increase the fluidity of the phospholipid bilayer which leads to cell lysis.
However, bacteria are known to have higher enzymatic activity at higher temperature because of increased thermal energy. For example, when thermophilic sludge treatment is compared to mesophilic treatment, the sludge biodegradability is higher with thermophilic degradation [9].
Hence the temperature has to be controlled precisely to maximize the efficiency of degradation but also allow the cell to remain viable. There are a lot of nutrients available in the sewage because of human waste and agricultural runoff [3]. Bacteria can harvest the electron from organic matter and transfer it to a terminal electron acceptor which results in the break down of organic matter and energy conservation [10].
Bioaerosol samples A1—A11 were collected in single repetition in July and February , at ten workplaces covering different stages of the technological process Table 2. Additionally, approximately m outside from the plant, the background samples to relativize the obtained results were collected.
In total, 22 air samples were collected. The characteristics of sampling point selected for the assessment of airborne anaerobic bacteria in a wastewater treatment plant. Sewage and sludge samples were taken directly into 50 mL sterile, screwed-off Falcon tubes and transported to a laboratory for further analysis.
Air samples were stationary collected using 6-stage Andersen impactor model , Graseby-Andersen, Inc. The impactor was set at a height of approx. The sampling time was 5 min, a flow rate of the air was Calibration of the flow rate was carried out before and after each measurement using a digital flow meter model Gilibrator-2, Sensidyne, Inc.
Between the sampling sessions, an impactor was subjected to disinfection and cleaning with isopropyl alcohol. The graph including size distribution results was created with Microsoft Excel software Microsoft Corp. Simultaneously with bioaerosol measurements, at each sampling point, the temperature and relative humidity were measured with the use of portable thermo-hygrometer model TFA Sewage and sludge samples were subjected to extraction in saline solution.
The analysis of anaerobic bacteria was based on their ability for enzymatic degradation of organic substrates and subsequent detection of the appropriate metabolites generated by these reactions. Taking into account the biochemical imperfections of bacterial identification methods, molecular analysis of Clostridium pathogens was also carried out on the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis.
The size of the PCR product and the specificity of the primers were checked by performing electrophoretic analysis in 1. StatSoft, Inc. The average concentration of anaerobic bacteria in the wastewater samples was 5. The highest values were noted in raw sewage flowing into the treatment plant P1—1. Taking into account anaerobic bacteria in sludge, the average concentration was 1. The most contaminated were the screenings P4—4. The results of the quantitative analysis of airborne bacterial biota are presented in Table 3.
The highest winter concentrations of airborne bacteria were found near the bar screens 4. As in the summer, there was no growth of anaerobic bacteria at the conveyor belts, as well as in the control room in the building of sludge thickening.
S4, S8—S The concentrations of anaerobic bacteria in the air at workplaces in the wastewater treatment plant. The qualitative analysis of sewage and sludge samples showed the presence of 12 bacterial species belonging to 5 genera: Actinomyces, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, Propionibacterium and Staphylococcus. In the sewage sludge, among isolated species, Clostridium perfringens was identified.
Qualitative analysis of bioaerosol showed the presence of 16 bacterial species belonging to 8 genera Table 4. It was found that all 16 species were solely identified in the air at mechanical wastewater treatment workplaces bar screens, containers with solids, primary settling tank.
Qualitative analysis of air samples also showed that some of the identified species, such as Actinomyces meyeri, Bifidobacterium spp. In turn, the species of the genera Propionibacterium, Bacterioides or Fusobacterium were characteristic for the primary treatment stages only.
Qualitative characteristics of anaerobic bacteria present in the wastewater treatment plant samples. Molecular analysis confirmed the presence of Clostridium strains in the wastewater and in the air Fig. Based on the data obtained using the Andersen impactor, it was possible to analyse the size distribution of anaerobic bacteria Fig. ANOVA analysis showed statistically significant differences between the technological stages of the plant in the whole range of aerodynamic diameters of bacterial aerosol.
Analysis of size distribution together with qualitative assessment of isolated species revealed that particles with aerodynamic diameters between 0. Size distribution analysis showed also that above the aerodynamic diameter of 1. Size distribution of anaerobic bacteria at workplaces in the wastewater treatment plant. The present study confirmed that anaerobic bacteria are commonly present in the wastewater treatment plant and the sewage entering the plant is their main source.
The sewer environment creates conditions, which favour the growth of anaerobic bacteria. They are involved in different fermentation processes leading to hydrogen sulfide and methane production as well as the release of volatile organic compounds odours. Among the various anaerobic microorganisms, the most often present are sulfate-reducing bacteria from, e.
It has been also confirmed that bacterial stains from Simplicispira, Comamonas, Azonexus, Thauera and other genera are able to form a biofilm on the walls of the sewers Satoh et al.
Hence, the high dynamics of the processes taking place in WWTP environment as well as the variability of physico-chemical conditions may result in a considerable diversity of the microbial communities in the sewage itself Liu et al. Due to that, it is difficult to directly compare how the results of such research perform under different environmental conditions e.
As soon as the wastewater flows out from the sewers and subsequently become subject to mechanical treatment processes in WWTP, anaerobic bacteria may be easily released from sewage into the air. Such a situation seems to be natural as the first places of sewage purification such as bar screens, containers with solids and primary settling tanks are located at the end of sewerage network. In our study, the phenomenon of such emission was confirmed by the highest bacterial concentrations in the wastewater entering the treatment plant, in screenings, in sand from the grit remover and in the air at workplaces.
However, as intensive aeration has negative effect on anaerobic bacteria, they were detected at lower levels in the air and water at subsequent treatment stages. The qualitative analysis showed a great similarity between the bacteria identified in wastewater and in the air, especially regarding Actinomyces, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium and Propionibacterium genera.
Waste removed during the process is digested by microbes, and what remains is dried and disposed of in landfills, incinerators or applied to soil as a conditioner, depending on the source and process. Large-scale operations manage the bulk of our wastewater and follow a process called activated sludge. Invented a little over years ago, this process incorporates the following basic steps: filtration, activation aeration , clarification settling and disinfection.
Illustration showing the main steps of the activated sludge process used by large-scale wastewater management facilities. Once the water has clarified to the satisfaction of the facility, the activated sludge, which has concentrated at the bottom, is sent off for further processing. Remaining sludge goes through a second bacterial digestion without oxygen.
0コメント